Case Study · Collections Strategy & Risk Management | Enterprise B2B
A $10K Policy That Created
a $30M Write-Off
Collections strategy built on invoice size ignores the variable that actually matters: default risk. The cost of ignoring the right data is never abstract.
Policy Threshold
Under $10K ignored
AR Portfolio Impacted
$30M (50% of AR)
Outcome
Full Write-Off
The Situation
Leadership directed the AR team to ignore invoice balances under $10,000. The reasoning: only large invoices move the reporting needle, so focus collection effort there. On the surface it sounded efficient. It was not.
What We Found
The large invoices belonged to large firms: blue chip corporations and government entities with negligible default risk. These customers pay. They pay slowly, on their own schedule, but they pay. Calling them does not accelerate payment. It is simply the cost of doing business at that level.
The small invoices told a different story. Most belonged to smaller firms where default risk was real and collections contact was the difference between getting paid and writing it off. Smaller customers operate without the bureaucratic certainty of a Fortune 500 payment cycle. If no one calls, no one pays.
“BP will pay the $250K invoice whether I call them or not. The small firm owing $9K will only pay if I call. The policy had it exactly backwards.”
What Happened
We raised the risk repeatedly and documented it in reporting, hardcoding it so leadership could not remove it from view. Leadership ignored it. Smaller customers, realizing no one would collect balances under $10K, stopped paying entirely. The uncollected balance grew steadily.
By the time leadership acted, the under $10K balance had reached $30M, representing 50% of the total AR portfolio. They took the write-off and removed the Sr. Director who created the policy.
